GLM-5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

GLM-5 (Reasoning) wins overall with a score of 75 vs 34 (41 point difference).GLM-5 (Reasoning) wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

93

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40.8

96
MMLU
43
94
GPQA
42
92
SuperGPQA
40
90
OpenBookQA
38

Coding

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

88

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

35

88
HumanEval
35

Mathematics

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

96.6

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

42

98
AIME 2023
43
99
AIME 2024
45
98
AIME 2025
44
94
HMMT Feb 2023
39
96
HMMT Feb 2024
41
95
HMMT Feb 2025
40
96
BRUMO 2025
42

Reasoning

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

GLM-5 (Reasoning)

91

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40

92
SimpleQA
41
90
MuSR
39

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) scores higher overall with 75 vs 34, a difference of 41 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 93 vs 40.8.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads in coding with an average score of 88 vs 35.

Which is better for math, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads in math with an average score of 96.6 vs 42.

Which is better for reasoning, GLM-5 (Reasoning) or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

GLM-5 (Reasoning) leads in reasoning with an average score of 91 vs 40.