Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1 vs Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 19 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
53.65/100
Margin
5.7pts
winning →
59.35/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1 #94 (Estimated); Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) share 19 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to GPT-5.1; 8 to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
19
GPT-5.1 only
2
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
8
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 19 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.1 is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning). GPT-5.1 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-5.1ΔKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
AgenticGPT-5.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)55.0
CodingGPT-5.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)76.8
KnowledgeGPT-5.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)87.2
MathGPT-5.126.4MarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not measured
MultimodalGPT-5.1Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)78.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1$1.25 input / $10 outputKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputKimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1111 tok/sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.157.47 sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1200KKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128KGPT-5.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.0%21.7%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 81.9%95.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Gert LabsSource 41.24%32.58%GPT-5.1 leads
GDPval-AASource 24.4%25.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 9871009Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 11.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 24.61%17.54%GPT-5.1 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 49.4%46.8%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 43.3%49.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 75.0%65.3%GPT-5.1 leads
CritPtSource 4.9%3.1%GPT-5.1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 36.9%35.4%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.3%87.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 26.5%29.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 5.6%-8.1%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.6%34.3%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.3%64.6%GPT-5.1 leads
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 31.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 12.500%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.5%75.4%GPT-5.1 leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12201282Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 72.9%70.2%GPT-5.1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) today?

GPT-5.1: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.