Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1 vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
53.65/100
Margin
5.9pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1 #94 (Estimated); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to GPT-5.1; 1 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
16
GPT-5.1 only
5
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.1 is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning). GPT-5.1 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-5.1ΔQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
MathGPT-5.126.4MarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1$1.25 input / $10 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1111 tok/sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.157.47 sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1200KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KGPT-5.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.0%19.9%GPT-5.1 leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 81.9%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Gert LabsSource 41.24%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 24.4%23.1%GPT-5.1 leads
GDPval-AASource 987962GPT-5.1 leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 24.61%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 49.4%48.2%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-SciCodeSource 43.3%42.0%GPT-5.1 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 75.0%65.7%GPT-5.1 leads
CritPtSource 4.9%1.7%GPT-5.1 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 36.9%33.7%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.3%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 26.5%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 5.6%-29.8%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.6%31.4%GPT-5.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.3%89.1%GPT-5.1 leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 31.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 12.500%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.5%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1220Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 72.9%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

GPT-5.1: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.