Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.2 Pro #23 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GPT-5.2 Pro; 38 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.2 Pro only
0
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
38
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5.2 Pro yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.2 Pro is priced at $25.00 input / $150.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. Nemotron 3 Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2 Pro.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.2 Pro$25 input / $150 outputNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.2 ProNot availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.2 ProNot availableNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.2 Pro400KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —56.4%Not comparable
PinchBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource —44.4%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource —70.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —33.2%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —37.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —27.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —83.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1164Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —81.7%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —36.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —71.9%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —67.7%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —56.4%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —49.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —39.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource —67.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource —3.1%Not comparable
LongBench v2Source —61.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
GPQASource —87%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —87.0%Not comparable
HLESource —26.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —26.7%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —86.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —21.6%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —37.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —86.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —26.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —-0.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —28.5%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource —83.3%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource —83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1129Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProNemotron 3 UltraResult
IFBenchSource —81.7%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —81.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra today?

GPT-5.2 Pro: $25.00 input / $150.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Ultra: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

OpenAI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.