Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.2 vs Laguna XS.2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
57.62/100
No comparison
Poolside
N/A
2 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.2 #71 (Estimated); Laguna XS.2 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.2 and Laguna XS.2 share 2 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 26 results are unique to GPT-5.2; 3 to Laguna XS.2.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
2
GPT-5.2 only
26
Laguna XS.2 only
3
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.2 makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 400K context window; Laguna XS.2 is the better fit if you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.2 and Laguna XS.2 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Laguna XS.2. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 256K for Laguna XS.2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.2 and Laguna XS.2
CategoryGPT-5.2ΔLaguna XS.2
AgenticGPT-5.255.7Margin 20.0Laguna XS.235.7
CodingGPT-5.270.6Margin 9.8Laguna XS.260.8
ReasoningGPT-5.252.9MarginNo overlapLaguna XS.2Not measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.292.4MarginNo overlapLaguna XS.2Not measured
MathGPT-5.235.2MarginNo overlapLaguna XS.2Not measured
MultimodalGPT-5.280.4MarginNo overlapLaguna XS.2Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-5.2B · Laguna XS.2
  1. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 80%B 69.9%
    Winner: GPT-5.2Δ 10.1
    SWE-bench Verified: GPT-5.2 scored 80%; Laguna XS.2 scored 69.9%. GPT-5.2 wins this benchmark.
  2. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 55.6%B 46.3%
    Winner: GPT-5.2Δ 9.3
    SWE-bench Pro: GPT-5.2 scored 55.6%; Laguna XS.2 scored 46.3%. GPT-5.2 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.2$1.75 input / $14 outputLaguna XS.2$0 input / $0 outputLaguna XS.2 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.273 tok/sLaguna XS.2Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.2130.34 sLaguna XS.2Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.2400KLaguna XS.2256KGPT-5.2 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.2 wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
BrowseCompSource 65.8%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 47.3%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 84.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.54%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 34.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 35.7%Not comparable
CodingGPT-5.2 wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80%69.9%GPT-5.2 leads
SWE-bench ProSource 55.6%46.3%GPT-5.2 leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 53.50%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 52.1%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 57.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 35.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
ARC-AGI-2Source 52.9%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 72.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 11.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
GPQASource 92.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 35.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -1.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
AA AIME 2025Source 99.0%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 40.700%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.800%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
MMMU-ProSource 79.5%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 83.0%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82.1%Not comparable
V*Source 75.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Laguna XS.2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 75.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Laguna XS.2?

GPT-5.2 and Laguna XS.2 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 or Laguna XS.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 60.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.2 or Laguna XS.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55.7 versus 35.7. Laguna XS.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.