Skip to main content

GPT-5.2 vs MiniMax M2.7

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GPT-5.2

81

VS

MiniMax M2.7

62

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiniMax M2.7
55.2vs57

+1.8 difference

Coding

GPT-5.2
64.7vs53.7

+11.0 difference

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.2

MiniMax M2.7

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.75 / $14

$0.3 / $1.2

Speed

73 t/s

45 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

130.34s

2.53s

Context Window

400K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 81 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 64.7 against 53.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 55.6% to 56.2%. MiniMax M2.7 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.7. That is roughly 11.7x on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M2.7 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for MiniMax M2.7.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or MiniMax M2.7?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 81 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 55.6% and 56.2%.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.2 or MiniMax M2.7?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 53.7. Inside this category, Vibe Code Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.2 or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 55.2. GPT-5.2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.