Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Laguna M.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
62.79/100
No comparison
Poolside
N/A
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 Pro #42 (Estimated); Laguna M.1 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 Pro and Laguna M.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-5.5 Pro; 5 to Laguna M.1.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.5 Pro only
7
Laguna M.1 only
5
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.5 Pro makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; Laguna M.1 is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.5 Pro and Laguna M.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

GPT-5.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Laguna M.1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.5 ProLaguna M.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputLaguna M.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.5 ProNot availableLaguna M.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.5 ProNot availableLaguna M.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.5 Pro1MLaguna M.1256KGPT-5.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProLaguna M.1Result
BrowseCompSource 90.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProLaguna M.1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 63.1%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 49.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProLaguna M.1Result
CritPtSource 30.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProLaguna M.1Result
HLESource 57.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProLaguna M.1Result
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 52.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 51.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 39.600%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-5.5 Pro or Laguna M.1?

GPT-5.5 Pro and Laguna M.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or Laguna M.1?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.1 versus 45.8. Laguna M.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.