Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5 (medium) vs Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.15/100
Margin
4.2pts
winning →
59.35/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5 (medium) #84 (Supported); Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5 (medium) and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GPT-5 (medium); 14 to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
13
GPT-5 (medium) only
1
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
14
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5 (medium) and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5 (medium) and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-5 (medium)ΔKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
AgenticGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)55.0
CodingGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)76.8
KnowledgeGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)87.2
MultimodalGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)78.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5 (medium)Not availableKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5 (medium)83 tok/sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5 (medium)36.28 sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5 (medium)128KKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 86.5%95.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 11.5%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 32.58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 25.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1009Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 41.1%49.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 17.54%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 46.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 72.8%65.3%GPT-5 (medium) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%3.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%35.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.2%87.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 23.5%29.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.1%-8.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 38.9%34.3%GPT-5 (medium) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.1%64.6%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA MATH-500Source 99.1%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.3%75.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12171282Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 70.6%70.2%GPT-5 (medium) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5 (medium) and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5 (medium) and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) today?

GPT-5 (medium): Pricing unavailable Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.