Knowledge
Directional only- GPT-6 Luna
- 63.6
- Estimated · #29/189
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- 32.9
- Estimated · #179/189
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 5 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Directional only
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Decision reading
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead.
0 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Updated September 22, 2026. Rank says GPT-6 Luna is ahead. Price, access, and your workload can each overturn that. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.
Both of these models will change. Get the price, version and retirement notices for the pair, each with its source. Follow model changes
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Which one for a specific job
Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.
The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.
66.6GPT-6 Luna—Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Not comparable · BenchAlign
The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.
Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
7 GPT-6 Luna only
- Shared results
- 0
- GPT-6 Luna only
- 7
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
1 category rests on Estimated evidence or different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Agentic
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- 56.7
- Estimated · #35/157
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 1 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- 66.6
- Estimated · #11/159
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 1 vs 0 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- 78.3
- Unranked · 2 rankable rows
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- 71.3
- Unranked · 1 rankable row
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- Not ranked
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- Not ranked
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- GPT-6 Luna
- Not ranked
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 63.6Estimated · #29/189 | 32.9Estimated · #179/189 | Directional onlyBenchAlign lane · 5 vs 0 public rows | Directional only |
| Agentic | 56.7Estimated · #35/157 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 1 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 66.6Estimated · #11/159 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 1 vs 0 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | 78.3Unranked · 2 rankable rows | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 71.3Unranked · 1 rankable row | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- GPT-6 Luna
- $0.00035
- Fits in one request
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- GPT-6 Luna
- $0.0065
- Fits in one request
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- GPT-6 Luna
- $0.009
- Fits in one request
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Does not fit in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationGPT-6 LunaQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
GPT-6 Luna
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
128K
API model ID
GPT-6 Luna
gpt-6-luna
OpenAI GPT-6 Luna model documentationQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
GPT-6 Luna
$0.01 per 1M cached input tokens
OpenAI GPT-6 Luna model documentationQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
GPT-6 Luna
text, image
OpenAI GPT-6 Luna model documentationQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Not sourced
Documented outputs
GPT-6 Luna
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Not sourced
Provider availability
GPT-6 Luna
Generally Available · OpenAI Responses API, OpenAI Chat Completions API, ChatGPT Work, Codex
OpenAI GPT-6 Sol and Luna launchQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
GPT-6 Luna
Reasoning
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Non-Reasoning
Weight access
GPT-6 Luna
Proprietary
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Open Weight
License
GPT-6 Luna
Proprietary
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Open Weight
Release date
GPT-6 Luna
2026-09-16
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
2025-01-01
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- GPT-6 Luna has the larger documented window (1.05M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence7 rows
Agentic
ExploitGym
GPT-6 Luna11.6%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
Coding
DeepSWE
GPT-6 Luna66.6%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
Knowledge
HealthBench (raw)
GPT-6 Luna50.0%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
HealthBench (length-adjusted)
GPT-6 Luna54.5%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
HealthBench Professional
GPT-6 Luna60.8%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
HealthBench Professional (raw)
GPT-6 Luna61.2%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
HealthBench Hard
GPT-6 Luna31.4%SourceQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct—Not directly comparable
Questions
Which is better, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
GPT-6 Luna has the larger documented context window: 1.05M, compared with 128K.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 22, 2026
Watch GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.