Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-OSS 20B vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.74/100
Margin
16.8pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-OSS 20B #159 (Supported); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-OSS 20B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to GPT-OSS 20B; 1 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
16
GPT-OSS 20B only
2
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-OSS 20B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-OSS 20B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-OSS 20B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputGPT-OSS 20B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-OSS 20B313 tok/sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-OSS 20B0.65 sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-OSS 20B128KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 3.1%19.9%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 0.7%15.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 60.2%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 3.0%23.1%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 559962Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
React Native EvalsSource 71%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.7%48.2%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-SciCodeSource 34.4%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 30.7%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 1.4%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.8%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 9.8%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -63.9%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.1%89.1%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 882Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 65.1%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-OSS 20B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-OSS 20B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

GPT-OSS 20B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.