Model comparison
Grok 4.20 vs Holo3.1-4B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.20 #88 (Estimated); Holo3.1-4B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Grok 4.20 and Holo3.1-4B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Grok 4.20; 1 to Holo3.1-4B.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Grok 4.20 only
- 18
- Holo3.1-4B only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Grok 4.20 and Holo3.1-4B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok 4.20 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-4B. Grok 4.20 has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-4B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok 4.20 | Holo3.1-4B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok 4.20$2 input / $6 output | Holo3.1-4B$0 input / $0 output | Holo3.1-4B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok 4.20233 tok/s | Holo3.1-4BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok 4.2010.33 s | Holo3.1-4BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok 4.202M | Holo3.1-4B262K | Grok 4.20 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 | Holo3.1-4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2Source | 53.3% | — | Not comparable |
Knowledge4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok 4.20 and Holo3.1-4B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok 4.20 and Holo3.1-4B today?
Grok 4.20: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Holo3.1-4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.