Skip to main content

Grok 4.20 vs Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Grok 4.20

73

VS

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

76

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Pick Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.20 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 2M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
47.1vs54.6

+7.5 difference

Coding

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
61vs76.8

+15.8 difference

Multimodal

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
70.8vs78.5

+7.7 difference

Operational Comparison

Grok 4.20

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $6

$0.6 / $3

Speed

233 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

10.33s

N/A

Context Window

2M

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.20 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 2M context window.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 76 versus 73. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 76.8 against 61. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 47.1% to 50.8%.

Grok 4.20 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning). That is roughly 2.0x on output cost alone. Grok 4.20 gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Grok 4.20 or Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 76 to 73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 47.1% and 50.8%.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.20 or Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76.8 versus 61. Inside this category, Vibe Code Bench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Grok 4.20 or Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 54.6 versus 47.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Grok 4.20 or Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.5 versus 70.8. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.