Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Grok 4.3
79
Laguna M.1
46
Pick Grok 4.3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Coding
+9.1 difference
Grok 4.3
Laguna M.1
$1.25 / $2.5
$0 / $0
209 t/s
N/A
12.36s
N/A
1M
131K
Pick Grok 4.3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna M.1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Grok 4.3 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 46. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Grok 4.3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.25 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Laguna M.1. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Grok 4.3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 131K for Laguna M.1.
Grok 4.3 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 46.
Laguna M.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.4 versus 47.3. Grok 4.3 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.