Agentic
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Model comparison
Grok 4.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Updated July 30, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead.
0 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
2 Grok 4.3 only
16 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- Shared results
- 0
- Grok 4.3 only
- 2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 16
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Coding
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 32.0
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 76.3
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 2 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 76.3
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Grok 4.3
- Not measured
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- 74.2
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Grok 4.3 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not measured | 32.0 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not measured | 76.3 | Not comparable0 vs 2 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not measured | 76.3 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | 74.2 | Not comparable0 vs 1 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Grok 4.3
- $0.0025
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Grok 4.3
- $0.07
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Grok 4.3
- $0.09
- Fits in one request
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationGrok 4.3Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Grok 4.3
1M
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
256K
API model ID
Grok 4.3
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Grok 4.3
$0.2 per 1M cached input tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Grok 4.3
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Grok 4.3
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Provider availability
Grok 4.3
Not sourced
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Grok 4.3
Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Reasoning
Weight access
Grok 4.3
Proprietary
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Open Weight
License
Grok 4.3
Proprietary
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Open Weight
Release date
Grok 4.3
2026-04-30
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
2026-04-28
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Grok 4.3 has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence18 rows
Agentic
Gert Labs
Grok 4.343.86%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
ResearchClawBench
Grok 4.312.4%SourceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—Not directly comparable
OSWorld
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B47.4%SourceNot directly comparable
τ²-bench results
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B45.3%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
Knowledge
Math
AIME 2025
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B82.1%SourceNot directly comparable
Multimodal
MMMU
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B70.8%SourceNot directly comparable
MMLongBench-Doc
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.5%SourceNot directly comparable
CharXiv
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3%SourceNot directly comparable
ScreenSpot Pro
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%SourceNot directly comparable
AI2D_TEST
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B88.5%SourceNot directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B90.5%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
IFBench
Grok 4.3—Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2%SourceNot directly comparable
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Grok 4.3 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Grok 4.3 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Grok 4.3 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Grok 4.3 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Grok 4.3 or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Grok 4.3 has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 256K.
Related comparisons
Last updated July 30, 2026
Watch Grok 4.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.