Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #83 (Supported); Mistral Medium 3.5 128B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning); 13 to Mistral Medium 3.5 128B.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
12
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
1
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 256K for Mistral Medium 3.5 128B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
CategoryGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)ΔMistral Medium 3.5 128B
CodingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMistral Medium 3.5 128B77.6

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableMistral Medium 3.5 128B$1.5 input / $7.5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableMistral Medium 3.5 128BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableMistral Medium 3.5 128BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MMistral Medium 3.5 128B256KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%94.2%Mistral Medium 3.5 128B leads
τ³-bench resultsSource 91.4%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 21.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 933Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 39.10%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 33.7%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 69.1%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 516Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 14.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%39.6%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 46.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA-LCRSource 64.7%61.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.9%0.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 27.4%29.9%Mistral Medium 3.5 128B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%74.8%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 17.0%12.8%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%-36.3%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%25.1%Mistral Medium 3.5 128B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.0%82.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA Openness IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.8%64.9%Mistral Medium 3.5 128B leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Mistral Medium 3.5 128BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 50.5%68.8%Mistral Medium 3.5 128B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B today?

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: $1.50 input / $7.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.