Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Margin
2.9pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #76 (Supported); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning); 5 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
1
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
5
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 962Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%42.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 48.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 64.7%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.9%1.7%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 27.4%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 17.0%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%-29.8%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.0%89.1%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.8%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 50.5%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.