Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
MiniMax M2.7 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 57 to 48. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Grok Code Fast 1 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for MiniMax M2.7.
Pick MiniMax M2.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok Code Fast 1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Grok Code Fast 1
77.6
MiniMax M2.7
56.2
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
MiniMax M2.7 is ahead overall, 57 to 48.
Grok Code Fast 1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.6 versus 56.2. MiniMax M2.7 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.