Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

38.64/100
Margin
20.9pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok Code Fast 1; 6 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
Grok Code Fast 1 only
1
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok Code Fast 1. Grok Code Fast 1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
CategoryGrok Code Fast 1ΔQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
CodingGrok Code Fast 170.8MarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputGrok Code Fast 1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok Code Fast 12.81 sQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok Code Fast 1256KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KGrok Code Fast 1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 75.7%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 962Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 48.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 48.3%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.6%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.7%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 7.5%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.0%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.8%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.5%89.1%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 41.4%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok Code Fast 1 and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.