Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF vs MiniMax M3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
MiniMax M3
MiniMax
69.75/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF unranked (Not scored); MiniMax M3 #15 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiniMax M3 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF; 45 to MiniMax M3.

Updated July 17, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF only
0
MiniMax M3 only
45
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiniMax M3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

MiniMax M3 is priced at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF. MiniMax M3 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF$0 input / $0 outputMiniMax M3$0.3 input / $1.2 outputHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableMiniMax M3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableMiniMax M3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF262KMiniMax M31MMiniMax M3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —66%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource —83.5%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —70.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —74.2%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —74.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —35.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —88.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —44.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1395Not comparable
GDPval rubricsSource —74.7%Not comparable
BankerToolBenchSource —76.1%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —19.8%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —4.6%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —1110Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —32.1%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —6.7%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —42.4%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —65.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —80.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —59%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —66.0%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —42.1%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —58.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —45.4%Not comparable
VIBE V2Source —50.1%Not comparable
SVG-BenchSource —63.7%Not comparable
KernelBench HardSource —28.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
AA-LCRSource —74.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource —3.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —44.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —92.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —37.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —1.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —15.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —16.1%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource —33.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
USAMO 2026Source —85.7%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
OfficeQA ProSource —45.1%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.6%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource —78.1%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —84.6%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —85.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1291Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —78.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiniMax M3Result
AA-IFBenchSource —82.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiniMax M3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiniMax M3 today?

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M3: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

H Company Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 17, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.