Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo3.1-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
Zyphra
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B and ZAYA1-8B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B; 11 to ZAYA1-8B.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3.1-35B-A3B only
1
ZAYA1-8B only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B and ZAYA1-8B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Holo3.1-35B-A3B is priced at $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for ZAYA1-8B. Holo3.1-35B-A3B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3.1-35B-A3BZAYA1-8BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B$0.25 input / $1.8 outputZAYA1-8B$0 input / $0 outputZAYA1-8B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3.1-35B-A3BNot availableZAYA1-8BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3.1-35B-A3BNot availableZAYA1-8BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B262KZAYA1-8B131KHolo3.1-35B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BZAYA1-8BResult
AndroidWorldSource 79.3%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 39.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BZAYA1-8BResult
LiveCodeBench v6Source 65.8%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BZAYA1-8BResult
GPQASource 71%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 71.0%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 74.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BZAYA1-8BResult
AIME26Source 89.1%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 71.6%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 59.3%Not comparable
ApexSource 32.2%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BZAYA1-8BResult
IFEvalSource 85.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 52.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B and ZAYA1-8B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B and ZAYA1-8B today?

Holo3.1-35B-A3B: $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens ZAYA1-8B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.