K-Exaone vs Nemotron-4 15B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

K-Exaone has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 49 versus 46. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

K-Exaone's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 49.4 against 27.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 49.4% to 31%.

K-Exaone is the reasoning model in the pair, while Nemotron-4 15B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. K-Exaone gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 32K for Nemotron-4 15B.

Quick Verdict

Pick K-Exaone if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron-4 15B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
Terminal-Bench 2.0
37%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
47%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
42%

Coding

K-Exaone

K-Exaone

49.4

Nemotron-4 15B

27.2

49.4%
SWE-bench Verified
31%
Coming soon
HumanEval
46%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
22%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
30%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
46%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
54%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
50%
Coming soon
BBH
73%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
52%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
51%

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMLU
54%
Coming soon
GPQA
53%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
51%
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
63%
Coming soon
HLE
5%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
50%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
52%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
79%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
75%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
71%

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2023
54%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
56%
Coming soon
AIME 2025
55%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
50%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
52%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
51%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
53%
Coming soon
MATH-500
71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, K-Exaone or Nemotron-4 15B?

K-Exaone is ahead overall, 49 to 46. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 49.4% and 31%.

Which is better for coding, K-Exaone or Nemotron-4 15B?

K-Exaone has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49.4 versus 27.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.