Skip to main content

Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Mistral Large 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

59.35/100
Margin
17.6pts
← winning
41.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated); Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Mistral Large 2 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning); 0 to Mistral Large 2.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
11
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
16
Mistral Large 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Mistral Large 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Mistral Large 2
CategoryKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)ΔMistral Large 2
AgenticKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)55.0MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured
CodingKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)76.8MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured
KnowledgeKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)87.2MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured
MultimodalKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)78.5MarginNo overlapMistral Large 2Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputMistral Large 2Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableMistral Large 238 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableMistral Large 21.45 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128KMistral Large 2128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 11.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%30.7%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Gert LabsSource 32.58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 25.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1009Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 17.54%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 49.0%29.2%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 46.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
AA-LCRSource 65.3%5.3%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 3.1%0.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 35.4%9.2%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.9%48.6%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 29.4%4.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -8.1%-34.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.3%20.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.6%67.8%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Math
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1279Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Mistral Large 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 70.2%31.2%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Mistral Large 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Mistral Large 2 today?

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.