Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Fugu Cyber
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated); Fugu Cyber unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Fugu Cyber share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning); 2 to Fugu Cyber.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
- 27
- Fugu Cyber only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Fugu Cyber is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Fugu Cyber is priced at $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning). Fugu Cyber has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Fugu Cyber | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 output | Fugu Cyber$6 input / $36 output | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not available | Fugu CyberNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not available | Fugu CyberNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128K | Fugu Cyber1M | Fugu Cyber lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 50.8% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 60.6% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 11.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 32.58% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 21.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 25.4% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1009 | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 86.9% | Not comparable |
| CTI-REALMSource | — | 72.1% | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 87.6% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 87.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 35.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 29.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -8.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 34.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 64.6% | — | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 96.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Fugu Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 70.2% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Fugu Cyber on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Fugu Cyber today?
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Fugu Cyber: $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.