Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Ternary Bonsai 4B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated); Ternary Bonsai 4B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Ternary Bonsai 4B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning); 0 to Ternary Bonsai 4B.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
- 27
- Ternary Bonsai 4B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Ternary Bonsai 4B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Ternary Bonsai 4B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ternary Bonsai 4B. Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Ternary Bonsai 4B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Ternary Bonsai 4B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 output | Ternary Bonsai 4B$0 input / $0 output | Ternary Bonsai 4B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not available | Ternary Bonsai 4BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not available | Ternary Bonsai 4BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128K | Ternary Bonsai 4B32K | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Ternary Bonsai 4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 50.8% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 60.6% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 11.5% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 95.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 32.58% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 21.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 25.4% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1009 | — | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Ternary Bonsai 4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 87.6% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 87.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 35.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 29.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -8.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 34.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 64.6% | — | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Ternary Bonsai 4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | 96.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) | Ternary Bonsai 4B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 70.2% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Ternary Bonsai 4B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) and Ternary Bonsai 4B today?
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Ternary Bonsai 4B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.