Skip to main content

Model comparison

Kimi K2 vs Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Moonshot AI
27.19/100
Margin
32.2pts
winning →
59.35/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Kimi K2 #189 (Supported); Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Kimi K2 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Kimi K2; 15 to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
Kimi K2 only
2
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
15
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Kimi K2 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Kimi K2 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
CategoryKimi K2ΔKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
AgenticKimi K2Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)55.0
CodingKimi K2Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)76.8
KnowledgeKimi K2Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)87.2
MathKimi K216.1MarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not measured
MultimodalKimi K2Not measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)78.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensKimi K2$0.6 input / $2.5 outputKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputKimi K2 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondKimi K243 tok/sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenKimi K21.51 sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensKimi K2128KKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 61.1%95.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 11.5%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 32.58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 21.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 25.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1009Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 34.5%49.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 17.54%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 46.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 51.0%65.3%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%3.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.4%35.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.6%87.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 7.0%29.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -27.5%-8.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 26.8%34.3%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 74.2%64.6%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 21.404%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 10831282Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkKimi K2Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 41.5%70.2%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Kimi K2 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Kimi K2 and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) today?

Kimi K2: $0.60 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.