Skip to main content

Model comparison

Laguna M.1 vs Sarvam 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Poolside
N/A
No comparison
39.83/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Laguna M.1 unranked (Not scored); Sarvam 30B #178 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Laguna M.1 and Sarvam 30B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Laguna M.1; 11 to Sarvam 30B.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
0
Laguna M.1 only
5
Sarvam 30B only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Laguna M.1 and Sarvam 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Laguna M.1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 64K for Sarvam 30B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLaguna M.1Sarvam 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLaguna M.1Not availableSarvam 30B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLaguna M.1Not availableSarvam 30BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLaguna M.1Not availableSarvam 30BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLaguna M.1256KSarvam 30B64KLaguna M.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Sarvam 30BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 34.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Sarvam 30BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 63.1%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 49.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 45.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 19.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Sarvam 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Sarvam 30BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 7.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -72.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 12.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 97.0%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLaguna M.1Sarvam 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 26.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Laguna M.1 and Sarvam 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Laguna M.1 and Sarvam 30B today?

Laguna M.1: Pricing unavailable Sarvam 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.