Skip to main content

Model comparison

Laguna XS.2 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Poolside
N/A
No comparison
56/100
1 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Laguna XS.2 unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.5-35B-A3B #80 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Laguna XS.2 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B share 2 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Laguna XS.2; 26 to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
2
Laguna XS.2 only
3
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
26
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Laguna XS.2 makes more sense if coding is the priority; Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is the better fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Laguna XS.2 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Laguna XS.2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Laguna XS.2 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
CategoryLaguna XS.2ΔQwen3.5-35B-A3B
AgenticLaguna XS.235.7Margin 15.3Qwen3.5-35B-A3B51.0
CodingLaguna XS.260.8Margin 0.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3B60.6
ReasoningLaguna XS.2Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-35B-A3B59.0
KnowledgeLaguna XS.2Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-35B-A3B81.6
MultilingualLaguna XS.2Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-35B-A3B81.0
Inst. FollowingLaguna XS.2Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-35B-A3B91.9

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Laguna XS.2B · Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 35.7%B 40.5%
    Winner: Qwen3.5-35B-A3BΔ 4.8
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Laguna XS.2 scored 35.7%; Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scored 40.5%. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B wins this benchmark.
  2. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 69.9%B 69.2%
    Winner: Laguna XS.2Δ 0.7
    SWE-bench Verified: Laguna XS.2 scored 69.9%; Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scored 69.2%. Laguna XS.2 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLaguna XS.2$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5-35B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondLaguna XS.2Not availableQwen3.5-35B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLaguna XS.2Not availableQwen3.5-35B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLaguna XS.2256KQwen3.5-35B-A3B262KQwen3.5-35B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticQwen3.5-35B-A3B wins
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 35.7%40.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads
BrowseCompSource 61%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 54.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 89.2%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 28.96%Not comparable
CodingLaguna XS.2 wins
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 69.9%69.2%Laguna XS.2 leads
SWE MultilingualSource 57.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 46.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 35.7%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 53.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 37.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
LongBench v2Source 59%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 62.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
MMLU-ProSource 85.3%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 63.4%Not comparable
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 29.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 19.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -46.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 20.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.0%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
MMLU-ProXSource 81%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
MMMUSource 81.4%Not comparable
MMVUSource 72.3%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 83.9%Not comparable
V*Source 92.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 72.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLaguna XS.2Qwen3.5-35B-A3BResult
IFEvalSource 91.9%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 72.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Laguna XS.2 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Laguna XS.2 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Laguna XS.2 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Laguna XS.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60.8 versus 60.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Laguna XS.2 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51 versus 35.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.