Skip to main content

Model comparison

Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Large 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

39.87/100
Margin
1.9pts
winning →
41.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported); Mistral Large 2 #163 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Large 2 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Llama 4 Scout; 0 to Mistral Large 2.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
Llama 4 Scout only
7
Mistral Large 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Large 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLlama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 outputMistral Large 2Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondLlama 4 Scout128 tok/sMistral Large 238 tok/sLlama 4 Scout has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLlama 4 Scout0.70 sMistral Large 21.45 sLlama 4 Scout reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLlama 4 Scout10MMistral Large 2128KLlama 4 Scout lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 15.5%30.7%Mistral Large 2 leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 90Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
AA Coding IndexSource 8.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 17.0%29.2%Mistral Large 2 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
AA-LCRSource 25.8%5.3%Llama 4 Scout leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 10.0%9.2%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 58.7%48.6%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-HLESource 4.3%4.0%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -52.4%-34.0%Mistral Large 2 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.6%20.1%Mistral Large 2 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.3%67.8%Mistral Large 2 leads
Math
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 52.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 783Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutMistral Large 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 39.5%31.2%Llama 4 Scout leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Large 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Llama 4 Scout and Mistral Large 2 today?

Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Large 2: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Llama 4 Scout
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even
Mistral Large 2
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.