Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5-Pro #14 (Supported); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5-Pro; 1 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 16
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
- 15
- Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Δ | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | MiMo-V2.5-Pro68.4 | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured |
| Coding | MiMo-V2.5-Pro57.2 | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured |
| Knowledge | MiMo-V2.5-Pro48.0 | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5-ProNot available | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.5-Pro1M | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128K | MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic14 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 63.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1265 | 962 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 72.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 68.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 29.1% | 19.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 94.2% | 95.6% | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 38.3% | 23.1% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 2.4% | 15.3% | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 62.70% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 873 | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 38.2% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 43.2% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 65.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 73.3% | — | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 48% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 34% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.2% | 33.7% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.6% | 89.3% | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads |
| AA-HLESource | 33.8% | 27.3% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 3.6% | -29.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 22.6% | 31.4% | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 24.5% | 89.1% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 38.9% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 79.9% | 78.8% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Pricing unavailable Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.