MiniMax M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 100B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Nemotron 3 Super 100B has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 60 versus 57. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

MiniMax M2.7 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Super 100B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Nemotron 3 Super 100B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for MiniMax M2.7.

Quick Verdict

Pick Nemotron 3 Super 100B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Agentic

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax M2.7

57

Nemotron 3 Super 100B

56.6

57%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
56%
46.3%
Toolathlon
Coming soon
66.6%
MLE-Bench Lite
Coming soon
62.7%
MM-ClawBench
Coming soon
Coming soon
BrowseComp
61%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
54%

Coding

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax M2.7

56.2

Nemotron 3 Super 100B

41.5

56.2%
SWE-bench Pro
44%
76.5%
SWE Multilingual
Coming soon
52.7%
Multi-SWE Bench
Coming soon
55.6%
VIBE-Pro
Coming soon
39.8%
NL2Repo
Coming soon
Coming soon
HumanEval
57%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
44%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
38%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

1495
GDPval-AA
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
55%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
67%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
60%
Coming soon
BBH
83%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
75%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
75%

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

50
Artificial Analysis
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU
65%
Coming soon
GPQA
64%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
62%
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
72%
Coming soon
HLE
13%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
63%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
62%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
84%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
84%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
77%

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2023
65%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
67%
Coming soon
AIME 2025
66%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
61%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
63%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
62%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
64%
Coming soon
MATH-500
83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, MiniMax M2.7 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?

Nemotron 3 Super 100B is ahead overall, 60 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 56.2% and 44%.

Which is better for coding, MiniMax M2.7 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 41.5. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiniMax M2.7 or Nemotron 3 Super 100B?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 56.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.