Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 63 to 57. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 60 against 56.2.
MiniMax M2.7 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning). That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M2.7 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiniMax M2.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).
Pick Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
MiniMax M2.7
56.2
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
60
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is ahead overall, 63 to 57.
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 60 versus 56.2. MiniMax M2.7 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.