Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
49
Sakana Fugu Ultra
100
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Coding
+30.0 difference
Knowledge
+20.0 difference
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Sakana Fugu Ultra
$0 / $0
$5 / $30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
1M
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 49. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 83.5 against 53.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 63.2% to 93.2%.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Sakana Fugu Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 49. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 63.2% and 93.2%.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 75.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.5 versus 53.5. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.