Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
47
ZAYA1-8B
62
Pick ZAYA1-8B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
Knowledge
+2.4 difference
Inst. Following
+0.2 difference
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
ZAYA1-8B
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
131K
Pick ZAYA1-8B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.
ZAYA1-8B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 62 to 47. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.
ZAYA1-8B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 62 to 47. The biggest single separator in this matchup is IFBench, where the scores are 74.2% and 52.6%.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 73.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 74.2 versus 74. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.