Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron Ultra 253B vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

44.4/100
Margin
15.1pts
winning →
59.5/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron Ultra 253B #150 (Estimated); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron Ultra 253B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Nemotron Ultra 253B; 6 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
Nemotron Ultra 253B only
0
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron Ultra 253B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron Ultra 253B. Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for Nemotron Ultra 253B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron Ultra 253B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputNemotron Ultra 253B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron Ultra 253BNot availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron Ultra 253BNot availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron Ultra 253B32KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 11.4%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 962Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-SciCodeSource 34.7%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 48.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 7.3%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.1%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.8%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 8.1%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -45.5%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 19.9%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.7%89.1%Nemotron Ultra 253B leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron Ultra 253BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 38.2%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron Ultra 253B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron Ultra 253B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

Nemotron Ultra 253B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.