Qwen2.5-VL-32B vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) wins overall with a score of 70 vs 34 (36 point difference).Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40.8

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

88

43
MMLU
91
42
GPQA
89
40
SuperGPQA
87
38
OpenBookQA
85

Coding

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

35

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

83

35
HumanEval
83

Mathematics

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

42

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

92

43
AIME 2023
93
45
AIME 2024
95
44
AIME 2025
94
39
HMMT Feb 2023
89
41
HMMT Feb 2024
91
40
HMMT Feb 2025
90
42
BRUMO 2025
92

Reasoning

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

86

41
SimpleQA
87
39
MuSR
85

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) scores higher overall with 70 vs 34, a difference of 36 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 88 vs 40.8.

Which is better for coding, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in coding with an average score of 83 vs 35.

Which is better for math, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in math with an average score of 92 vs 42.

Which is better for reasoning, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads in reasoning with an average score of 86 vs 40.