Model comparison
Fugu Cyber vs Step 3.5 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Fugu Cyber unranked (Not scored); Step 3.5 Flash #86 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Fugu Cyber and Step 3.5 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Fugu Cyber; 0 to Step 3.5 Flash.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Fugu Cyber only
- 2
- Step 3.5 Flash only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Fugu Cyber and Step 3.5 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Step 3.5 Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Fugu Cyber is priced at $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens for Step 3.5 Flash. Fugu Cyber has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Step 3.5 Flash.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Fugu Cyber | Step 3.5 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Fugu Cyber$6 input / $36 output | Step 3.5 Flash$0.1 input / $0.3 output | Step 3.5 Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Fugu CyberNot available | Step 3.5 Flash87 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Fugu CyberNot available | Step 3.5 Flash3.03 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Fugu Cyber1M | Step 3.5 Flash256K | Fugu Cyber lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Fugu Cyber and Step 3.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Fugu Cyber and Step 3.5 Flash today?
Fugu Cyber: $6.00 input / $36.00 output per 1M tokens Step 3.5 Flash: $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.