Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

ASCII Arena

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Kaggle's ASCII Arena asks models to draw everyday subjects as ASCII art, and people vote for the better drawing.

Evaluation results published by Kaggle. How Kaggle Benchmarks reruns tests.

Arena rating on ASCII Arena v1 — Latest evaluation November 13, 2026

We mirror the published arena rating view for ASCII Arena v1. Gemini 4 Carbon has the highest reported value at 2019. A rating gap smaller than the two rows' intervals is not a reliable difference. We do not use these results to rank models overall.

18 source rowsCross-domainCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated Latest evaluation November 13, 2026

Arena rating table (18 source rows)

Arena rating results for ASCII Arena
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Gemini 4 CarbonCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 173 votes; ±127; Evaluated 2026-11-13
2019
Not reportedUnknown
2Gemini 4 ArgonCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 411 votes; ±99; Evaluated 2026-11-11
1983
Not reportedUnknown
3GPT-6 AstraCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 427 votes; ±86; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1730
Not reportedUnknown
4GPT-6.1 SolCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 437 votes; ±85; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1686
Not reportedUnknown
5Gemini 3.8 FlashCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 405 votes; ±85; Evaluated 2026-11-11
1672
Not reportedUnknown
6Claude Opus 5.5Creator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 445 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1651
Not reportedUnknown
7Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 454 votes; ±83; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1573
Not reportedUnknown
8Claude Sonnet 5.5Creator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 419 votes; ±83; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1541
Not reportedUnknown
9Claude Opus 5Creator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 427 votes; ±83; Evaluated 2026-11-12
1506
Not reportedUnknown
10GPT-6 SolCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 445 votes; ±82; Evaluated 2026-11-11
1497
Not reportedUnknown
11Claude Fable 5.1Creator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 424 votes; ±83; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1484
Not reportedUnknown
12Claude Haiku 5.5Creator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 409 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-12
1354
Not reportedUnknown
13Kimi K3Creator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 410 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1303
Not reportedUnknown
14GPT-5.6 TerraCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 445 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-12
1294
Not reportedUnknown
15Qwen 3.8 MaxCreator not reportedXhigh Reasoning; 429 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-11
1282
Not reportedUnknown
16GPT-6 LunaCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 447 votes; ±83; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1279
Not reportedUnknown
17Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 423 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1271
Not reportedUnknown
18GPT-5.6 LunaCreator not reportedHigh Reasoning; 446 votes; ±84; Evaluated 2026-11-13
1262
Not reportedUnknown

How to read this leaderboard

Read the rating as a preference ranking for ASCII art among the models on this board, with its vote count and interval. It does not measure accuracy.

Operator receipt: 18 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the highest published score among these 18 source rows is Gemini 4 Carbon at 2019, which does not establish a market leader.

Honest limit: The rating moves as votes arrive, and Kaggle publishes no confidence level for its interval. Rows with few votes have wide intervals, so neighbouring models are often not separable. Voters are self-selected Kaggle visitors. The board declares no license; we keep published aggregates with attribution and no task or output contents.

How to read ASCII Arena

Subjects come from Google's Quick, Draw! dataset. It tests visual layout using plain text characters only. Kaggle shows two anonymous outputs for the same prompt and a person picks the better one. The Arena column is the relative rating Kaggle fits to those votes, published with an interval; it is not a percentage.

The rating moves as votes arrive, and Kaggle publishes no confidence level for its interval. Rows with few votes have wide intervals, so neighbouring models are often not separable. Voters are self-selected Kaggle visitors. The board declares no license; we keep published aggregates with attribution and no task or output contents.

Snapshot

18 source rows173 to 454 votes per rowNo license declaredDisplay only

A rating gap smaller than the two rows' intervals is not a reliable difference. The table retains each source configuration and its reported value.

18 source rows are shown for ASCII Arena. The benchmark falls in the Cross-domain category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. ASCII Arena is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About ASCII Arena

Year

2026

Tasks

ASCII drawings of subjects from Google's Quick, Draw! dataset, rated by human votes

Format

Relative rating fitted to human pairwise votes

Difficulty

Text-character drawing

Subjects come from Google's Quick, Draw! dataset. It tests visual layout using plain text characters only. Kaggle shows two anonymous outputs for the same prompt and a person picks the better one. The Arena column is the relative rating Kaggle fits to those votes, published with an interval; it is not a percentage. These results are display-only and do not enter overall or category rankings.

Freshness and provenance

Version

ASCII Arena 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does ASCII Arena measure?

Kaggle's ASCII Arena asks models to draw everyday subjects as ASCII art, and people vote for the better drawing.

Which source row has the highest reported ASCII Arena value?

Gemini 4 Carbon has the highest reported ASCII Arena value at 2019. A rating gap smaller than the two rows' intervals is not a reliable difference. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on ASCII Arena?

The Latest evaluation November 13, 2026 snapshot contains 18 AI models.

Last updated: Latest evaluation November 13, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.