Claude Fable 5.2

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 out of 214 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 91.19/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 35 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 out of 179 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 97.6/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 out of 158 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 86.9/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 out of 157 eligible models for reasoning and logic, with a public category score of 90.7/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 out of 132 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 90.7/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Fable 5.2 ranks #1 out of 67 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 89.8/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Claude Fable 5.2 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multilingual tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Claude Fable 5.2 belongs to the Claude Fable family. Related tracked variants include Claude Fable 5, Claude Fable 5.1. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

No. Claude Fable 5.2 currently has 55 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

Claude Fable 5.2 has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.