Chartography without tools (Chartography (no tools))
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Professional chart understanding across 100 specialized chart types with expert-set answer tolerances.
Benchmark score on Chartography (no tools) — September 27, 2026
We compile the Chartography (no tools) rows from provider self-reports. Claude Opus 5.5 leads the table at 64.4%, followed by Claude Opus 5 (29.6%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
2 modelsMultimodal & GroundedCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated September 27, 2026
Benchmark score table (2 models)
ScoreAbout Chartography (no tools)
Year
2026
Tasks
100 specialized chart types
Format
Accuracy without tools
Difficulty
Professional chart reasoning
Section 8.12.1 reports a five-run max-effort average without tools using Anthropic's implementation of the official tasks and ranges.
Freshness and provenance
Version
Chartography (no tools) 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does Chartography (no tools) measure?
Professional chart understanding across 100 specialized chart types with expert-set answer tolerances.
Which model scores highest on Chartography (no tools)?
Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic currently leads with a score of 64.4% on Chartography (no tools).
How many models are evaluated on Chartography (no tools)?
2 AI models have been evaluated on Chartography (no tools) on BenchLM.
Compare top models on Chartography (no tools)
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.