Chartography with image and code tools (Chartography (tools))
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Professional chart understanding with a container, standard libraries, and image cropping.
Benchmark score on Chartography (tools) — November 13, 2026
We compile the Chartography (tools) rows from provider self-reports. Claude Fable 5.2 leads the table at 91.6%, followed by Claude Sonnet 5.5 (90.2%) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (90.2%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
Claude Fable 5.2
Anthropic
Reported by AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
Reported by AnthropicKimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
Reported by Moonshot AI9 modelsMultimodal & GroundedCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 13, 2026
Benchmark score table (9 models)
All 9 results on this page were reported by the labs that built the models.
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Who ran it | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2AnthropicReported by Anthropic | 91.6% | Reported by Anthropic | Not reported | Closed |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicReported by Anthropic | 90.2% | Reported by Anthropic | Not reported | Closed |
| 3 | Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AIReported by Moonshot AI | 90.2% | Reported by Moonshot AI | Not reported | Open |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicReported by Anthropic | 89.0% | Reported by Anthropic | Not reported | Closed |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicReported by Anthropic | 86.2% | Reported by Anthropic | Not reported | Closed |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5AnthropicReported by Anthropic | 83.0% | Reported by Anthropic | Not reported | Closed |
| 7 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekReported by DeepSeek | 83.0% | Reported by DeepSeek | Not reported | Open |
| 8 | Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines LabReported by Thinking Machines Lab | 80.4% | Reported by Thinking Machines Lab | Not reported | Closed |
| 9 | GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AIReported by Z.AI | 78.0% | Reported by Z.AI | Not reported | Open |
- Lab-reported
- Benchmark-run
- Independent
Among the reported Chartography (tools) rows, Claude Fable 5.2 is first at 91.6%. The third row is 1.4 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 13.6 points, so the table still separates the published systems.
9 models have been evaluated on Chartography (tools). The benchmark falls in the Multimodal & Grounded category. Chartography (tools) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About Chartography (tools)
Year
2026
Tasks
100 specialized chart types
Format
Accuracy with tools
Difficulty
Professional chart reasoning
Section 8.12.1 reports a five-run max-effort average with tools using Anthropic's implementation of the official tasks and ranges.
Freshness and provenance
Version
Chartography (tools) 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does Chartography (tools) measure?
Professional chart understanding with a container, standard libraries, and image cropping.
Which model scores highest on Chartography (tools)?
Claude Fable 5.2 by Anthropic currently leads with a score of 91.6% on Chartography (tools).
How many models are evaluated on Chartography (tools)?
9 AI models have published results on Chartography (tools) in the BenchLM catalog.
Compare top models on Chartography (tools)
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 7,000+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.