Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data
9 records · Browse by task

Legal benchmarks

Find tests for legal reasoning, research, case retrieval, and document work.

Jurisdiction, task set, tools, and grading change what each result means. These tests do not establish legal accuracy in a particular matter or replace a review of your workflow.

Records keep metrics and harness variants separate. Source rows can include different model and agent configurations; linked profiles count distinct public model identities. Neither count represents independent evaluations. Dates describe the stored source record.

Public model rows count finite, displayable results linked to reviewed original artifacts. Publisher comparison charts can include other providers' models. Follow the result link to inspect each row's source and run conditions.

Legal reasoning and research

  • PRBench Legal

    41 stored source rows · 22 linked model profiles

    Snapshot label: October 15, 2026 snapshot

    Original source

    Published professional-reasoning configurations remain separate from legal-agent runs.

    41 published rows

  • LegalBench

    151 stored source rows · 85 linked model profiles

    Source update in snapshot: 2026-10-13

    Source snapshot captured: 2026-10-15T18:47:28.403Z

    Original source

    The Vals-hosted LegalBench result stays separate from any other LegalBench harness.

    Legal reasoning task views

  • Legal Research Bench

    78 stored source rows · 65 linked model profiles

    Source update in snapshot: 2026-10-12

    Source snapshot captured: 2026-10-15T18:47:28.403Z

    Original source

    US-law research task views preserve strict and weighted-pass results.

    US-law legal research tasks

Legal agent work

Historical evidence

  • CaseLaw v2

    54 stored source rows · 35 linked model profiles

    Archived source board

    Source update in snapshot: 2026-05-04

    Source snapshot captured: 2026-10-15T18:47:28.403Z

    Original source

    Archived Canadian case-law questions remain useful context for that specific retrieval task.

    Canadian case-law question answering

Other collections

All benchmarks