Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

ExploitBench — Internal Port (June–August 2026) (ExploitBench Internal Port)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

OpenAI's internal port of ExploitBench restricted to V8 and Chrome vulnerabilities disclosed in June to August 2026, to limit contamination from historical exploits.

Benchmark score on ExploitBench Internal Port — November 5, 2026

We compile the ExploitBench Internal Port rows from provider self-reports. GPT-6 Cyber leads the table at 42.0%, followed by GPT-6 Astra (39.0%) and GPT-6.1 Terra (24.5%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

7 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 5, 2026

Benchmark score table (7 models)

Benchmark score results for ExploitBench Internal Port
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1GPT-6 CyberOpenAI
42.0%
Not reportedClosed
2GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
39.0%
Not reportedClosed
3GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
24.5%
Not reportedClosed
4GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
21.5%
Not reportedClosed
5GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
5.5%
Not reportedClosed
6GPT-6 SolOpenAI
5.5%
Not reportedClosed
7GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
0.0%
Not reportedClosed

How to read this leaderboard

Operator receipt: 7 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the leading published row is GPT-6 Cyber at 42.0%.

Honest limit: Provider-run port with an unpublished task list; not comparable to the public ExploitBench Cap% score.

Among the reported ExploitBench Internal Port rows, GPT-6 Cyber is first at 42.0%. The third row is 17.5 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 42.0 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

7 models have been evaluated on ExploitBench Internal Port. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. We keep these results separate from the weighted global scoring system, so they remain source-specific evidence. ExploitBench Internal Port is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About ExploitBench Internal Port

Year

2026

Tasks

Recently disclosed V8 and Chrome vulnerabilities (June–August 2026)

Format

Mean arbitrary-code-execution success rate

Difficulty

Browser exploitation

The public ExploitBench uses vulnerabilities going back to 2023 and OpenAI models now score at or near 100% on it, which OpenAI says may be inflated by contamination. The internal port reports mean arbitrary-code-execution success across recently disclosed V8 and Chrome targets: GPT-6 Cyber 42.0%, GPT-6 Astra 39.0%, GPT-5.6 Sol 5.5% (charted as GPT-5.6 under Daybreak Blue). OpenAI's later system cards report the port on a series where GPT-6 Astra scores 31.5%: GPT-6.1 Terra 24.5%, GPT-6.1 Sol 21.5%, GPT-6 Sol 5.5%, GPT-6 Luna 0% and GPT-5.6 Sol 3.5%. BenchLM stores those rows as published, so compare rows from different OpenAI documents with care. OpenAI-run, so display-only and kept separate from the public ExploitBench leaderboard.

Freshness and provenance

Version

ExploitBench — Internal Port (June–August 2026)

Refresh cadence

Static

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Private provider task set with published aggregate results

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does ExploitBench Internal Port measure?

OpenAI's internal port of ExploitBench restricted to V8 and Chrome vulnerabilities disclosed in June to August 2026, to limit contamination from historical exploits.

Which model scores highest on ExploitBench Internal Port?

GPT-6 Cyber by OpenAI currently leads with a score of 42.0% on ExploitBench Internal Port.

How many models are evaluated on ExploitBench Internal Port?

7 AI models have published results on ExploitBench Internal Port in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: November 5, 2026 · BenchLM version ExploitBench — Internal Port (June–August 2026)

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.