Capability
80.5/100
field median 56.6
#6 of 236 ranked models
Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.
Follow model changesReleased Sep 16, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 22, 2026 · How the score is built
GPT-6 Sol will be repriced, updated or retired. Get each notice with its source and date. Follow model changes
Check the published record for the model and serving route you use.
Check this modelShare or export
Coding ranks #6. Particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
11 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
80.5/100
field median 56.6
#6 of 236 ranked models
Price
$2input / $10 output
input median $0.97
cached $0.20 · blended $6
Speed
Not measured
field median 90.5 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
1.05Mtokens
field median 256,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #7 of 157Percentile 96thWeight 22%4 benchmarksVerified | 69.7 | #7 of 157 | 96th | 22% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #6 of 159Percentile 97thWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 74.3 | #6 of 159 | 97th | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank #6 of 189Percentile 97thWeight 12%5 benchmarksVerified | 80.2 | #6 of 189 | 97th | 12% | 5 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | Score68.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark 1.3 · 75.4% | Gap6.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AutomationBench | Score33.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 54.8% | Gap21.6 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Provider exact |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Score60.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 72.6% | Gap12.1 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Provider exact |
| Agents' Last Exam | Score56.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 59.3% | Gap2.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| ExploitGym | Score22.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 42.4% | Gap20.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HealthBench (raw)HealthBench raw score | Score47.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 68.1% | Gap21 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| HealthBench (length-adjusted)HealthBench length-adjusted score | Score53.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 60.6% | Gap7.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| HealthBench Professional | Score60.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 65.6% | Gap4.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| HealthBench Professional (raw)HealthBench Professional raw score | Score59.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5.5 · 77.1% | Gap17.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| HealthBench Hard | Score30.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark · 42.8% | Gap12.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC-Bench Pro | Score66.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 85.4% | Gap19.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
GPT-6 Sol category percentile values
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Mar 5, 2026
GPT-5.4Score 71.0 · $2.5 / $15
Apr 23, 2026
GPT-5.5Score 71.7 · $5 / $30
Jul 9, 2026
GPT-5.6 SolScore 80.3 · $4 / $20
Sep 16, 2026 · you are here
GPT-6 SolScore 80.5 · $2 / $10
sol · sol
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
GPT-6 Sol ranks #6 of 236 on the public leaderboard with a score of 80.45/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
GPT-6 Sol is a proprietary model with a 1.05M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Released September 16, 2026 in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Edu users, and in the OpenAI API as gpt-6-sol. OpenAI documents Responses API support for built-in tools and function calling; Chat Completions supports function calling when reasoning_effort is set to none.
OpenAI documents GPT-6 Sol as a distinct API model for complex coding and agentic workflows, with configurable reasoning, text and image input, text output, and a 1,050,000-token context window. OpenAI publishes an initial set of provider-run measurements; the model stays unranked until comparable independent benchmark coverage reaches BenchLM's threshold.
GPT-6 Sol sits in the GPT-6 family with GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Luna. Its explicit predecessor is GPT-5.6 Sol. 11 of 481 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Coding at #6, while its lowest eligible position is Agentic at #7. particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
OpenAI · Model release
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use GPT-6 Sol in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
GPT-6 Sol ranks #6 out of 236 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 80.45/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 11 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
GPT-6 Sol ranks #6 out of 189 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 80.2/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
GPT-6 Sol ranks #6 out of 159 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 74.3/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
GPT-6 Sol ranks #7 out of 157 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 69.7/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
GPT-6 Sol belongs to the GPT-6 family. Related tracked variants include GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Luna. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. GPT-6 Sol currently has 24 source-displayable rows across 481 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
GPT-6 Sol has a documented context window of 1.05M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Related resources
Last updated September 22, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.