Benchmark profile
Liquid image-to-JSON extraction schema consistency F1 (Liquid Extract F1)
A display-only Liquid AI extraction metric measuring field-name agreement between requested schema fields and extracted JSON fields.
Data verifiedBenchmark score on Liquid Extract F1 — July 29, 2026
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for Liquid Extract F1. LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract leads the public snapshot at 99.6% , followed by LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract (98.8%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract
LiquidAI
lfm2-5-vl-1-6b-extract
LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract
LiquidAI
lfm2-5-vl-450m-extract
Benchmark score table (2 models)
ScoreAbout Liquid Extract F1
Year
2026
Tasks
Image-to-JSON extraction
Format
Schema field F1
Difficulty
Structured visual extraction
Liquid reports Schema Consistency F1 as a macro-averaged set-level F1 over predicted versus requested field names. BenchLM keeps it separate from general OCR and VQA metrics.
BenchLM freshness & provenance
Version
Liquid Extract F1 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
FAQ
What does Liquid Extract F1 measure?
A display-only Liquid AI extraction metric measuring field-name agreement between requested schema fields and extracted JSON fields.
Which model scores highest on Liquid Extract F1?
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract by LiquidAI currently leads with a score of 99.6% on Liquid Extract F1.
How many models are evaluated on Liquid Extract F1?
2 AI models have been evaluated on Liquid Extract F1 on BenchLM.
Compare Top Models on Liquid Extract F1
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.