Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

HealthBench Professional — Mercor evaluation (HealthBench Professional (Mercor))

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Answering clinicians in care consults, documentation and medical research conversations. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.

Evaluation results published by Mercor. Published evaluation aggregates only; task contents and dataset license grants are not included.

Adjusted Score on HealthBench Professional (Mercor) — November 12, 2026 capture

We mirror the published adjusted score view for HealthBench Professional (Mercor). GPT-6 Astra leads the public snapshot at 64.50%, followed by GPT-6.1 Sol (64.40%) and Sonnet 5.5 (62.70%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

37 configurationsKnowledgeDated Mercor configurationsDisplay onlyUpdated November 12, 2026 capture

Adjusted Score table (37 configurations)

Adjusted Score results for HealthBench Professional (Mercor)
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1GPT-6 AstraOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
64.50%
Not reportedUnknown
2GPT-6.1 SolOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
64.40%
Not reportedUnknown
3Sonnet 5.5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
62.70%
Not reportedUnknown
4GPT-6 LunaOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
62.20%
Not reportedUnknown
5GPT-6 SolOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
61.40%
Not reportedUnknown
6GPT-5.6 Sol (Pro)OpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
61.40%
Not reportedUnknown
7Opus 5.5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
60.40%
Not reportedUnknown
8Fable 5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
59.00%
Not reportedUnknown
9Haiku 5.5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
58.80%
Not reportedUnknown
10Muse Spark OpenMetaSingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 1,050 reported samples
57.20%
Not reportedUnknown
11Fable 5.1AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
56.50%
Not reportedUnknown
12GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
56.30%
Not reportedUnknown
13Grok 4.7xAISingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
56.20%
Not reportedUnknown
14GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
55.90%
Not reportedUnknown
15Opus 5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
55.40%
Not reportedUnknown
16Gemini 4 ArgonGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
55.40%
Not reportedUnknown
17GLM-5.3ZhipuSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
52.90%
Not reportedUnknown
18Sonnet 5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
52.50%
Not reportedUnknown
19Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
52.40%
Not reportedUnknown
20GPT-5.5OpenAISingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
51.20%
Not reportedUnknown
21Kimi K3KimiSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
50.20%
Not reportedUnknown
22DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeekSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
49.90%
Not reportedUnknown
23Opus 4.7AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
49.70%
Not reportedUnknown
24Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
48.40%
Not reportedUnknown
25Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
46.40%
Not reportedUnknown
26Grok 4.6xAISingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
44.40%
Not reportedUnknown
27Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
43.90%
Not reportedUnknown
28Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
43.40%
Not reportedUnknown
29Grok 4.5xAISingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
42.50%
Not reportedUnknown
30BeamReflectionSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
41.70%
Not reportedUnknown
31InklingThinking MachinesSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
41.20%
Not reportedUnknown
32DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeekSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
40.90%
Not reportedUnknown
33Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaSingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
39.00%
Not reportedUnknown
34MiniMax-M3MiniMaxSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
37.10%
Not reportedUnknown
35Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
35.00%
Not reportedUnknown
36Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIASingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
32.90%
Not reportedUnknown
37DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
32.80%
Not reportedUnknown

How to read this Mercor evaluation

We captured Mercor's HealthBench Professional results on November 12, 2026. The table preserves 37 published configurations, their source identifiers, reasoning settings, and disclosed adjusted score values. These are results from Mercor's evaluation setup; we did not rerun them.

This dated source table is display only and does not enter overall or category rankings. Source configurations retain their external identity, including Pro descriptors and different effort settings.

The headline is the adjusted score Mercor publishes for the 525 physician-authored tasks. Margins are not reported. Scores labs report on their own runs, and other evaluators' runs, are listed separately and are not combined with this table.

The row labels retain published error margins and sample counts when supplied. Missing margins and counts remain unreported; a sample count is not used to reconstruct a task denominator. Except where the dedicated source defines an interval, the confidence level is unreported. Equal displayed scores and overlapping margins do not establish statistical ties. Capture time does not establish individual evaluation dates.

The general methodology lists expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion and a judge of LLM judge over expert rubrics. Its run-count label is k = 4. The linked result page takes precedence where its setup differs, as noted above.

The published HealthBench Professional (Mercor) snapshot places GPT-6 Astra first at 64.50%. The third row is 1.80 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 7.30 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

37 configurations are shown for HealthBench Professional (Mercor). The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. HealthBench Professional (Mercor) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About HealthBench Professional (Mercor)

Tasks

525 clinician tasks

Format

Adjusted Score

Difficulty

Source-specific evaluation

Mercor runs the 525 physician-authored HealthBench Professional tasks and publishes the adjusted score. Scores the labs report themselves stay on the HealthBench Professional page.

Freshness and provenance

Version

HealthBench Professional; Mercor Adjusted Score

Refresh cadence

Reviewed dated source capture

Staleness state

Dated Mercor configurations

Question availability

Upstream task access and terms; only aggregate results mirrored

Dated Mercor configurationsDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does HealthBench Professional (Mercor) measure?

Answering clinicians in care consults, documentation and medical research conversations. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.

Which model leads the published HealthBench Professional (Mercor) snapshot?

GPT-6 Astra currently leads the published HealthBench Professional (Mercor) snapshot with 64.50% adjusted score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on HealthBench Professional (Mercor)?

The November 12, 2026 capture snapshot contains 37 source configurations.

Last updated: November 12, 2026 capture · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.