HealthBench Professional — Mercor evaluation (HealthBench Professional (Mercor))
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Answering clinicians in care consults, documentation and medical research conversations. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.
Evaluation results published by Mercor. Published evaluation aggregates only; task contents and dataset license grants are not included.
Adjusted Score on HealthBench Professional (Mercor) — November 12, 2026 capture
We mirror the published adjusted score view for HealthBench Professional (Mercor). GPT-6 Astra leads the public snapshot at 64.50%, followed by GPT-6.1 Sol (64.40%) and Sonnet 5.5 (62.70%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
Single-shot agent · max reasoning
Margin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
Single-shot agent · max reasoning
Margin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
Single-shot agent · max reasoning
Margin not reported · 2,100 reported samples
37 configurationsKnowledgeDated Mercor configurationsDisplay onlyUpdated November 12, 2026 capture
Adjusted Score table (37 configurations)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 AstraOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 64.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 2 | GPT-6.1 SolOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 64.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 3 | Sonnet 5.5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 62.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 4 | GPT-6 LunaOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 62.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 5 | GPT-6 SolOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 61.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 6 | GPT-5.6 Sol (Pro)OpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 61.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 7 | Opus 5.5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 60.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 8 | Fable 5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 59.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 9 | Haiku 5.5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 58.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 10 | Muse Spark OpenMetaSingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 1,050 reported samples | 57.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 11 | Fable 5.1AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 56.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 12 | GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 56.30% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 13 | Grok 4.7xAISingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 56.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 14 | GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAISingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 55.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 15 | Opus 5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 55.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 16 | Gemini 4 ArgonGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 55.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 17 | GLM-5.3ZhipuSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 52.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 18 | Sonnet 5AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 52.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 19 | Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 52.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 20 | GPT-5.5OpenAISingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 51.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 21 | Kimi K3KimiSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 50.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 22 | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeekSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 49.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 23 | Opus 4.7AnthropicSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 49.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 24 | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 48.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 25 | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 46.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 26 | Grok 4.6xAISingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 44.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 27 | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 43.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 28 | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 43.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 29 | Grok 4.5xAISingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 42.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 30 | BeamReflectionSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 41.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 31 | InklingThinking MachinesSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 41.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 32 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeekSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 40.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 33 | Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaSingle-shot agent · xhigh reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 39.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 34 | MiniMax-M3MiniMaxSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 37.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 35 | Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogleSingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 35.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 36 | Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIASingle-shot agent · high reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 32.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 37 | DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekSingle-shot agent · max reasoningMargin not reported · 2,100 reported samples | 32.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
How to read this Mercor evaluation
We captured Mercor's HealthBench Professional results on November 12, 2026. The table preserves 37 published configurations, their source identifiers, reasoning settings, and disclosed adjusted score values. These are results from Mercor's evaluation setup; we did not rerun them.
This dated source table is display only and does not enter overall or category rankings. Source configurations retain their external identity, including Pro descriptors and different effort settings.
The headline is the adjusted score Mercor publishes for the 525 physician-authored tasks. Margins are not reported. Scores labs report on their own runs, and other evaluators' runs, are listed separately and are not combined with this table.
The row labels retain published error margins and sample counts when supplied. Missing margins and counts remain unreported; a sample count is not used to reconstruct a task denominator. Except where the dedicated source defines an interval, the confidence level is unreported. Equal displayed scores and overlapping margins do not establish statistical ties. Capture time does not establish individual evaluation dates.
The general methodology lists expert-authored rubrics, scored criterion by criterion and a judge of LLM judge over expert rubrics. Its run-count label is k = 4. The linked result page takes precedence where its setup differs, as noted above.
Snapshot
The published HealthBench Professional (Mercor) snapshot places GPT-6 Astra first at 64.50%. The third row is 1.80 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 7.30 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.
37 configurations are shown for HealthBench Professional (Mercor). The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. HealthBench Professional (Mercor) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About HealthBench Professional (Mercor)
Tasks
525 clinician tasks
Format
Adjusted Score
Difficulty
Source-specific evaluation
Mercor runs the 525 physician-authored HealthBench Professional tasks and publishes the adjusted score. Scores the labs report themselves stay on the HealthBench Professional page.
Freshness and provenance
Version
HealthBench Professional; Mercor Adjusted Score
Refresh cadence
Reviewed dated source capture
Staleness state
Dated Mercor configurations
Question availability
Upstream task access and terms; only aggregate results mirrored
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does HealthBench Professional (Mercor) measure?
Answering clinicians in care consults, documentation and medical research conversations. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.
Which model leads the published HealthBench Professional (Mercor) snapshot?
GPT-6 Astra currently leads the published HealthBench Professional (Mercor) snapshot with 64.50% adjusted score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on HealthBench Professional (Mercor)?
The November 12, 2026 capture snapshot contains 37 source configurations.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 7,000+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.