LatchBio SpatialBench Verified (SpatialBench Verified)
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Analysis of spatial transcriptomics data across externally validated biological problems.
Benchmark score on SpatialBench Verified — September 27, 2026
We compile the SpatialBench Verified rows from provider self-reports. Claude Opus 5 leads the table at 72.5%, followed by Claude Opus 5.5 (72.0%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
2 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated September 27, 2026
Benchmark score table (2 models)
ScoreAbout SpatialBench Verified
Year
2026
Tasks
115 externally validated spatial transcriptomics problems
Format
Task score
Difficulty
Professional bioinformatics
Section 8.17.2 reports this provider-run result as display-only life-science evidence.
Freshness and provenance
Version
SpatialBench Verified 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does SpatialBench Verified measure?
Analysis of spatial transcriptomics data across externally validated biological problems.
Which model scores highest on SpatialBench Verified?
Claude Opus 5 by Anthropic currently leads with a score of 72.5% on SpatialBench Verified.
How many models are evaluated on SpatialBench Verified?
2 AI models have been evaluated on SpatialBench Verified on BenchLM.
Compare top models on SpatialBench Verified
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.