Skip to main content

Agents-A1 vs Gemma 4 E4B

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Agents-A1 leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

Agents-A1

63

VS

Gemma 4 E4B

40

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Agents-A1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkAgents-A1ΔGemma 4 E4B
Knowledge47.6 19.867.4
Agentic75.5
Reasoning60.2
Inst. Following94.8

Operational Comparison

Agents-A1

Gemma 4 E4B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Agents-A1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 E4B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Agents-A1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 40. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Agents-A1 gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Gemma 4 E4B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Agents-A1 or Gemma 4 E4B?

Agents-A1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 40.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Agents-A1 or Gemma 4 E4B?

Gemma 4 E4B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.4 versus 47.6. Agents-A1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 7, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.