Model comparison
Agents-A1 vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Agents-A1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to Agents-A1; 8 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Agents-A1 only
- 6
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 8
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Agents-A1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Agents-A1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 63 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Agents-A1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Agents-A1.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Agents-A1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Agents-A1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Agents-A1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Agents-A1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Agents-A1262K | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Soofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic3 benchmarks
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEvalSource | — | 73.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
KnowledgeSoofi S 30B-A3B wins5 benchmarks
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8KSource | — | 86.1% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Agents-A1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEvalSource | 94.8% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Agents-A1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Agents-A1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 45.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Agents-A1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Soofi S 30B-A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 49.9 versus 47.6. Agents-A1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.