Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

1-bit Bonsai 8B vs Hy4 preview

Updated October 13, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.

Share or export
Share on XLinkedInAPI/MCP

Decision reading

The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead. 0 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Model A
Prism ML logo

Prism ML

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Model B
Tencent logo

Tencent

60.86/100

Estimated · Public rank #48

Conditional range 46.5–75.2

Shared results
0
1-bit Bonsai 8B only
2
Hy4 preview only
30
Like-for-like categories
0 / 8
Estimated: Hy4 preview. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    Hy4 preview

    Hy4 preview has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    1-bit Bonsai 8B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

    Confidence: limited
  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    1-bit Bonsai 8B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.

    Confidence: limited
  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates
  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. 1-bit Bonsai 8B does not fit this workload in one request. 1-bit Bonsai 8B has no comparable published API token rate. Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate.

    Confidence: listed-rates
  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

Which one for a specific job

Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.

The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.

—1-bit Bonsai 8B57.1Hy4 preview

Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8

The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.

Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.

Same basis rules as the category table below

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

A shared-evidence shape is not available.

BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
54.5
Estimated · #37/123
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 15 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
57.1
Supported · #26/148
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 8 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
88.3
Unranked · 1 rankable row
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
63.6
Estimated · #39/180
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 4 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
1-bit Bonsai 8B
Not ranked
Hy4 preview
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

1-bit Bonsai 8B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Hy4 preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

1-bit Bonsai 8B has no comparable published API token rate. Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

1-bit Bonsai 8B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Hy4 preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request

1-bit Bonsai 8B has no comparable published API token rate. Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

1-bit Bonsai 8B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Does not fit in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Hy4 preview
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

1-bit Bonsai 8B does not fit this workload in one request. 1-bit Bonsai 8B has no comparable published API token rate. Hy4 preview has no comparable published API token rate.

Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

1-bit Bonsai 8B

No comparable hosted API rate

Hy4 preview

No comparable hosted API rate

Tencent Hy4 preview model card

Documented inputs

1-bit Bonsai 8B

Not sourced

Hy4 preview

Not sourced

Documented outputs

1-bit Bonsai 8B

Not sourced

Hy4 preview

Not sourced

Provider availability

1-bit Bonsai 8B

Not sourced

Hy4 preview

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

1-bit Bonsai 8B

Non-Reasoning

Hy4 preview

Reasoning

Weight access

1-bit Bonsai 8B

Open Weight

Hy4 preview

Open Weight

License

1-bit Bonsai 8B

Open Weight

Hy4 preview

Open Weight

Release date

1-bit Bonsai 8B

2026-03-31

Hy4 preview

2026-08-28

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Hy4 preview has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Questions

Which is better, 1-bit Bonsai 8B or Hy4 preview?

The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, 1-bit Bonsai 8B or Hy4 preview?

1-bit Bonsai 8B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

Which is better for agentic tasks, 1-bit Bonsai 8B or Hy4 preview?

1-bit Bonsai 8B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.

Which costs less, 1-bit Bonsai 8B or Hy4 preview?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, 1-bit Bonsai 8B or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 64K.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence32 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview85.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CyberGym

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview78.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • WideResearch

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview83.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • DRACO

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview77.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP Atlas

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview83.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Toolathlon-Verified

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview74.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • APEX-Agents

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview37.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • skillsBench

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview62.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • JobBench

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview61.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Agents' Last Exam

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview22.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • AutomationBench

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview32.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BankerToolBench

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview78.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE w/ tools

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview55.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview55.1%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CWE-bench v1

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview53.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview85.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Pro

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview65.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE Multilingual

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview82.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepSWE

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview64.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • NL2Repo

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview58.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ProgramBench

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview17.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • PostTrain Bench

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview35.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • sweMarathon

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview31.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Reasoning

  • MuSR

    1-bit Bonsai 8B50%
    Source
    Hy4 preview—

    Not directly comparable

  • CritPt

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview16.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • OfficeQA Pro

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview66.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • GPQA

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview92.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA-D

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview92.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview55.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE w/o tools

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview43.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFEval

    1-bit Bonsai 8B79.8%
    Source
    Hy4 preview—

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • Apex

    1-bit Bonsai 8B—
    Hy4 preview74.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

32 public results · 0 shared

Watch 1-bit Bonsai 8B vs Hy4 preview

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,500+ readers.

Last updated October 13, 2026