Skip to main content

Model comparison

Celeris-1 vs GPT-4o mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Celeris
N/A
No comparison
37.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Celeris-1 unranked (Not scored); GPT-4o mini #183 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and GPT-4o mini share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 10 to GPT-4o mini.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Celeris-1 only
1
GPT-4o mini only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and GPT-4o mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Celeris-1 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4o mini. GPT-4o mini has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCeleris-1GPT-4o miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCeleris-1$2 input / $6 outputGPT-4o mini$0.15 input / $0.6 outputGPT-4o mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondCeleris-1Not availableGPT-4o mini33 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCeleris-1Not availableGPT-4o mini3.16 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCeleris-18KGPT-4o mini128KGPT-4o mini lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-4o miniResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 226Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-4o miniResult
AA-SciCodeSource 22.9%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 11.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-4o miniResult
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 6.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 42.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-4o miniResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 41.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-4o miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 31.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Celeris-1 and GPT-4o mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Celeris-1 and GPT-4o mini today?

Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-4o mini: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.